Tampilkan postingan dengan label In English. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label In English. Tampilkan semua postingan

Senin, 14 Mei 2012

Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria | Bacterial Resistance to Antibiotics

Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria | Bacterial Resistance to Antibiotics
Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria - A patient is ill with pneumonia and gets a prescription for penicillin. After 3 days, he feels much better and stops taking his pills. A few days later, his symptoms return. He quickly finds his pills and starts taking them again, but this time they have no effect. What happened? This frightening phenomenon is called antibiotic resistance.
Antibiotic resistance is caused by natural selection. Penicillin kills most of the pneumonia bacteria, but a few penicillin-resistant bacteria survive. These bacteria then multiply, and eventually the patient’s infection comes back only this time, the bacteria are resistant to penicillin.

Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria
When penicillin, the first antibiotic, became widely available, it was rightfully lauded as a wonder drug and dramatically cut the number of illnesses and deaths due to bacterial infections. After only a decade of use, however, the first penicillin-resistant bacterial strains appeared. Antibiotic resistance has only increased since then, with more and more bacterial populations becoming resistant to more and more different antibiotics. Diseases once easy to treat—tuberculosis, pneumonia, even common childhood ailments such as ear infections are now often resistant to multiple antibiotics. And in some hospitals, there are infectious bacteria that are resistant to every antibiotic on the market. Because it results from natural selection, antibiotic resistance is inevitable all antibiotic use contributes to resistance. 
However, resistance has been greatly accelerated by the overuse of antibiotics. Under pressure from patients, physicians often prescribe antibiotics for illnesses that are not caused by bacteria many commonillnesses, such as colds, flus, and most sore throats, for example, are caused by viruses. These antibiotics select for resistance in the normal (non-disease-causing) bacterial populations in our bodies, making it possible for resistance genes to be transferred to disease causing bacteria that later invade the body. The fact that patients sometimes stop taking their medications too soon only exacerbates the problem by selecting for antibiotic-resistant strains without providing the sustained dose that would actually kill all the bacteria. Antibiotics also see heavy usage in the livestock industry, where animals are sometimes given antibiotics regularly, even when they are healthy, in an attempt to prevent illness. Unfortunately, this practice only increases antibiotic resistance, a fact highlighted in 1983 by the development of antibiotic-resistant Salmonella poisoning in 18 people who ate meat from cows raised on antibiotics.
So, what can be done about antibiotic resistance? First, humans must learn to use antibiotics wisely, taking them only when they are needed that is, for bacterial infections and then taking the entire course of treatment. Physicians and veterinarians can also promote a socially responsible approach to antibiotics by educating patients and agriculturalists on the proper application of these drugs. Finally, since many antibiotics are less effective now because of resistance, scientists must continue to search for new antibiotics that will take the place of those that no longer do the job.
Tags : How do bacteria become resistant to antibiotics?, The Rise of Antibiotic-Resistant Infections, does bacteria become resistant to antibiotics, antibiotic resistant genes, can bacteria become resistant to antibiotics, have bacteria become resistant to antibiotics, Antibiotic Resistance Could Bring 'End of Modern Medicine, Ancient antibiotic-resistant bacteria, Drug resistance, Drug-Resistant Bacteria.

Minggu, 13 Mei 2012

PAINFUL EMOTION COMMANDS AND PHYSICAL PAIN

PAINFUL EMOTION COMMANDS AND PHYSICAL PAIN 
Besides visio and sonic, another vital recall to therapy is the somatic, which is to say the physical pain of the incident. Running a physically painful incident without a somatic is worthless. If physical pain is present, it may come only after considerable “unconsciousness” has been “boiled-off.” If the incident contains pain but the somatic is not turned on, the patient will wriggle his toes and breathe heavily and nervously or he may have jumping muscles. The foot wriggling is an excellent clue to the presence of any somatic turned on or not turned on. Breathing heavily and jumping muscles and various twitches without pain denote two things: either a denyer is in the incident and the content isn’t being contacted or, if the pre-clear is recounting, the somatic may be shut-off in the incident or elsewhere, either earlier by command or late by painful emotion. The patient who wriggles a great deal or who does not wriggle at all is suffering from a pain or emotion shut-off or late painful emotion engrams or both.
There is a whole species of commands which shut-off pain and emotion simultaneously: this is because the word “feel” is homonymic. “I can’t feel anything” is the standard, but the command varies widely and is worded in a great many ways. The auditor can pick up his own book of these from patients who, describing how they feel or rather, how they don’t feel, give them away. “It doesn’t hurt” is a class of phrases specifically shutting off pain, a class which includes, of course, such things as “There isn’t any pain,” etc. Emotion is shut off by a class of phrases which contain the word “emotion” or which specifically (literally translated) shut off emotion. The auditor should keep a book of all denyers, misdirectors, holders, bouncers and groupers which he discovers, each listed under its own heading. In this way he adds to material he can use for repeater technique when he sees something is wrong with the way the patient is moving on the track. But there are four other classes of phrases which he should also study and list: shut-offs, exaggerators, derailers and lie factories. He can also add to his classes. He will discover enormous numbers of commands in engrams which can accomplish these various aspects.  And he should be particularly interested in the pain and emotion shutoffs and the exaggerators, which is to say, those engramic commands which give the aspect of too much pain and too much emotion. There is no reason to give large numbers of them here. They are quite various, language being language. Many combinations are possible. A patient can be found to weep over the most trivial post-speech things and yet have few or no somatics. Several things can cause this. Either he had a mother or a father who wept for nine months before he was born or he has an exaggerator at work which commands that he be emotional about everything: “Too much emotion.” In combination with this he can have something which says he can feel no pain or can’t hurt or even can’t feel.
A patient who aches and suffers and yet cannot weep would have a reverse set of commands: he has a “no emotion” command early on the track or a long chain of them and yet has commands which dictate pain to excess: “I can’t stand the pain,” “The pain is too great,” “I always feel I’m in agony,” etc. “I feel bad,” on the other hand, is a shut-off because it says there is something wrong with the mechanism with which he feels and implies disability to feel.
Both pain and emotion can be commanded into exaggeration. But it is a peculiar thing that the body does not manufacture pain to be felt. All pain felt is genuine, even if exaggerated. Imaginary pain is non-existent. A person “imagines” only pain he has actually felt. He cannot imagine pain he has not felt. He may “imagine” pain at sometime later than the actual incident but if he feels pain, no matter how psychotic he is, that pain will be found to exist somewhere on his time track. Scientific tests have been carefully conducted in dianetics to establish this fact and it is a valuable one. You can test it yourself by asking patients to feel various pains, “imagining them” in present time. They will feel pains for you so long as you ask them to feel pains they have had.  Somewhere you will find the patient unable to actually feel the pain he is trying to “imagine.” Whether he is aware of it or not, he has had pain wherever he “imagines” it and is simply doing a somatic strip return for you on a minor scale.

PAINFUL EMOTION COMMANDSThis aspect of pain is quite interesting in that many patients have, at one time or another in their lives, pretended to the family or the world that they had a pain.  The patient thought, when he asserted this “make-believe” pain, that he was lying. In therapy the auditor can use these “imaginings” for they lead straight to sympathy engrams and actual injury. Further, these “imaginary” pains are generally displayed to the person or pseudo-person who was the sympathy ally present in the engramic moment. Thus, if a small boy always pretended to his grandmother, and thought he was pretending, that he had a bad hip, it will be discovered eventually that sometime in his early life he hurt that same hip and received sympathy during the engramic moment which is now eclipsed from the analyzer. Patients often feel quite guilty over these pretenses. Sometimes soldiers in the recent war have come home pretending they had been wounded and, when in therapy, are afraid the auditor will find out or give them away to their people. This soldier might not have been wounded in the war, but an engram will be found which contains sympathy for the injury of which he complains. He is asking for sympathy with a colorful story and believes he is telling a lie.  Without informing him of this dianetic discovery, the auditor can often flush into view a sympathy engram which might otherwise have to be arduously hunted down.

“Cry baby” is a phrase against which the pre-clear will negate in an engram, thus inhibiting tears. It is quite ordinary to find the pre-clear confusing himself with older brothers and sisters who are in his prenatal life:  their jeers, mother’s orders and so forth then all register.  If the pre-clear knows of any older children, the auditor should look for them in the engrams of prenatal life, for children are quite active and often bounce up and down on mother’s lap or collide with her. Any childish phrases of derision are then not always post birth.
It has been said during dianetic research that if one could release all the painful emotion of a lifetime, he would have ninety-percent of the clearing done.  However, the painful emotion is only a surface manifestation of the physical pain engrams and would not be painful if the physical pain did not co-exist or exist priorly. When emotion and pain shut-offs exist in a case, the patient is normally tense of muscle and nervous, given to twitching or merely tension. When pain and emotion are exaggerated by
commands, one has a highly dramatizing case on his hands.

L. Ron Hubbard - 2007 - Body, Mind & Spirit - 677 halaman

Polymers Win World War II

Polymers Win World War II - The search for a lightweight, nonbreakable, moldable material began with the invention of vulcanized rubber. This material is derived from natural rubber, which is a semisolid, elastic, natural polymer. In the 1700s, natural rubber was noted for its ability to rub off pencil marks, which is the origin of the term rubber. Natural rubber has few other uses, however, because it turns gooey at warm temperatures and brittle at cold temperatures. Then, in 1839, an American inventor, Charles Goodyear, discovered rubber vulcanization, a process in which natural rubber and sulfur are heated together. The product, vulcanized rubber, is harder than natural rubber and retains its elastic properties over a wide range of temperatures. With the invention of vulcanized rubber came modern products such as waterproof boots, rain jackets, and, most importantly, the rubber tire. In the 1930s, more than 90 percent of the natural rubber used for manufacturing in the United States came from Malaysia. In the days after Pearl Harbor was attacked in December 1941 and the United States entered World War II, however, Japan captured Malaysia. As a result, the United States—the land with plenty of everything, except rubberfaced its first natural resource crisis. The military implications were devastating because without rubber tires, military airplanes and jeeps were useless. Petroleum-based synthetic rubber had been developed in 1930 by DuPont chemist Wallace Carothers but was not widely used because it was much more expensive than natural rubber. With Malaysian rubber impossible to get and a war on, however, cost was no longer an issue. Synthetic rubber factories were constructed across the nation, and within a few years, the annual production of synthetic rubber rose from 2000 tons to about 800,000 tons. 
Also in the 1930s, British scientists developed radar as a way to track thunderstorms. With war approaching, these scientists turned their attention to the idea that radar could be used to detect enemy aircraft. Their radar equipment was massive, however. A series of ground-based radar stations could be built, but placing massive radar equipment on aircraft was not feasible. The great mass of the equipment was due to the large coils of wire needed to generate the intense radio waves. The scientists knew that if they could coat the wires with a thin, flexible electrical insulator, they would be able to design a radar device that was much less massive. Fortunately, the recently developed polymer polyethylene turned out to be an ideal electrical insulator. This permitted British radar scientists to construct equipment light enough to be carried by airplanes. These planes were slow, but flying at night or in poor weather, they could detect, intercept, and destroy enemy aircraft. Midway through the war, the Germans developed radar themselves, but without polyethylene, their radar equipment was inferior, and the tactical advantage stayed with the Allied forces. Nylon was invented in 1937, which was just prior to World War II
Aside from its use in hosiery, nylon also found great use in the manufacture of parachutes, important to the U.S. military. Up to that time, parachutes were made mainly of silk. The world’s foremost supplier of silk, however, was Japan. By the time World War II began, Japan had stopped exporting silk to the United States. The United States, however, now had nylon, which in many regards was better than silk. Over the course of the war practically all the nylon that DuPont could produce went to the military for the manufacture of a wide variety of nylon-based commodities suited for military purposes, such as parachutes, ropes, and  clothing. Four other polymers that had a significant impact on the outcome of World War II were Plexiglas, polyvinyl chloride, Saran, and Teflon. Plexiglas, or poly(methyl methacrylate), is a glasslike but moldable and lightweight material that made excellent domes for the gunner’s nests on fighter planes and bombers. Both Allied and German chemists used poly(methyl methacrylate), but only the Allied chemists learned how small amounts of this polymer in solution could prevent oil or hydraulic fluid from becoming too thick at low temperatures. Equipped with only a few gallons of a poly(methyl methacrylate) solution, Soviet forces were able to keep their tanks operational in the Battle of Stalingrad during the winter of 1943.
While Nazi equipment halted in the bitter cold, Soviet tanks and artillery functioned perfectly, resulting in victory and an important turning point in the war.

rand of Saran wrap
The now familiar plastic food wrap carton with
a cutting edge was introduced in 1953 by Dow
Chemical for its brand of Saran wrap.
Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) had been developed by a number of chemical companies in the 1920s. The problem with this material, however, was that it lost resiliency when heated. In 1929, Waldo Semon, a chemist at BFGoodrich, found that PVC could be made into a workable material by the addition of a plasticizer. In World War II, this material became recognized as an ideal waterproof material for tents and rain gear.
Originally designed as a covering to protect theater seats from chewing gum, Saran found great use in World War II as a protective wrapping for artillery equipment during sea voyages. (Before Saran, the standard operating procedure had been to disassemble and grease the artillery to avoid corrosion.) After the war, the polymer was reformulated to eliminate the original formula’s unpleasant odor and soon pushed cellophane aside to become the most popular food wrap of all time.
In the 1930s, Teflon was discovered serendipitously by chemists working at DuPont. Initially, the discoverers of Teflon were impressed by the long list of things this new material would not do. It would not burn, and it would not completely melt. Instead, at 620°F it congealed into a gel that could be conveniently molded. It would not conduct electricity, and it was impervious to attack by mold or fungus. No solvent, acid, or base could dissolve or corrode it. And most remarkably, nothing would stick to it, not even chewing gum.
Because of all the things Teflon would not do, DuPont was not quite sure what to do with it. Then, in 1944 the company was approached by governmental researchers in desperate need of a highly inert material to line the valves and ducts of an apparatus being built to isolate uranium 235 in the manufacture of the first nuclear bomb.
Thus Teflon found its first application, and 1 year later, World War II came to a close with the nuclear bombing of Japan. With a record of wartime successes, plastics were readily embraced in the postwar years. In the 1950s, Dacron polyester was introduced as a substitute for wool. Also, the 1950s were the decade during which the entrepreneur Earl Tupper created a line of polyethylene food containers known as Tupperware. By the 1960s, a decade of environmental awakening, many people began to recognize the negative attributes of plastics. Being cheap, disposable, and nonbiodegradable, plastic readily accumulated as litter and as landfill. With petroleum so readily available and inexpensive, however, and with a growing population of plastic-dependent baby boomers, little stood in the way of an ever-expandingarray of plastic consumer products. By 1977, plastics surpassed steel as the numberone material produced in the United States. Environmental concerns also continued to grow, and in the 1980s plastics recycling programs began to appear. Although the efficiency of plastics recycling still holds room for improvement, we now live in a time when sports jackets made of recycled plastic bottles are a valued commodity.



Key word : Win World War II, world war 2, poly (methyl methacrylate), saran wrap, plastics recycling programs

Sabtu, 12 Mei 2012

Wangari Maathai and Ecologically Sustainable Development

Wangari Maathai and Ecologically Sustainable Development - How much difference can planting one tree make? A lot, as Nobel laureate Wangari Maathai of Kenya has shown. Maathai, who was awarded the 2004 Nobel Peace Prize for her “contribution to sustainable development, democracy, and peace,” founded the Green Belt Movement in 1977. This grassroots group organizes volunteers primarily rural women to plant indigenous trees in forests, wildlife reserves, farms, and public places. Tree planting helps to reverse some of the serious problems caused by deforestation, including erosion, loss of biodiversity, and decreased water supply.

Green Belt Movement volunteers plant a tree
Green Belt Movement
volunteers plant a tree
Green Belt Movement volunteers have planted more than 30 million trees since the group was founded and continue to maintain more than 6000 tree nurseries across Kenya. Maathai’s Green Belt Movement also uses tree planting as an entry point for other activities. By enabling local communities to change environmental history, the organization empowers them to address issues related to environmental conservation, community consciousness, equity, livelihood security, and accountability. Maathai’s model has inspired similar groups in other countries, including Tanzania, Uganda, Ethiopia, and Zimbabwe. 
How important is environmentalism to the world?
In Maathai’s words, “Some people have asked what the relationship is between peace and environment, and
to them I say that many wars are fought over resources, which are becoming increasingly scarce across the earth. If we did a better job of managing our resources sustainably, conflicts over them would be reduced. So, protecting the global environment is directly related to securing peace.”*

key word : Nobel Laureate Wangari Maathai planting, Nobel Peace Prize 2004, Wangari Maathai Articles | Harvard International Review, Environmental responsibility is social responsibility, Earth Mother Wangari Maathai Dead at 71, Environmental Activist Maathai of Kenya Wins Peace Prize, Wangari Maathai First African Woman to be honored, Statement of African Development Foundation, Nobel Laureate Wangari Maathai to Deliver Lecture